TST: bump mpldev image test references - #19562
Merged
neutrinoceros merged 1 commit intoApr 11, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thank you for your contribution to Astropy! 🌌 This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainers who will review this pull request of some common things to look for.
|
Contributor
|
These changes should all be due to matplotlib/matplotlib#30161, which overhauled how fonts are rendered. I guess there might be image differences beyond just text if the text changes happen to affect bounds calculations for a given plot. |
Contributor
Author
neutrinoceros
marked this pull request as ready for review
April 11, 2026 11:49
astrofrog
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2026
meeseeksmachine
pushed a commit
to meeseeksmachine/astropy
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Description
There are 56 image tests currently failing with what appears to be a single pixel-wide diff in where axes ticks and labels are placed. Despite my best efforts1, I couldn't locate the corresponding upstream change, so here I'm working wihtin the assumption that the change was intentional rather than a regression.
@ayshih, would you, by chance, be able to confirm this diagnostic and/or pin point the upstream change ?
Footnotes
I tried to reproduce the error on a machine I control, and looked for related PRs recently merged upstream. ↩