I EA'd for a Fortune 500 CEO for a week. Here's what I learned: Email isn't communication. It's a task list pretending to be communication. What a morning looked like: 9:47am - "Can you send me your availability?" Opens calendar. Checks timezones. Types out three slots. 8 minutes. 10:23am - "None of those work, what about next week?" Does it again. 6 minutes. 11:15am - "Remember that budget conversation?" Searches 400 emails. Tries five different keywords. 12 minutes. Four hours of my day doing tasks that emails contained. The actual reading? Five minutes total. Every tool treats AI like a feature: autocomplete, summaries, drafts. Nobody recognizes that email is just tasks with extra steps. By day three, I kept thinking in commands that don't exist: "Just give them my availability" "Handle this scheduling thread" "Find that conversation" "Write the polite no" Not "help me write faster." Just do it. The same way developers use command lines instead of clicking menus. We have AI that can pass the bar exam. And I spent four hours manually typing out calendar availability. What if you could type /give-availability and it just worked? What if /schedule-this-meeting handled the entire back-and-forth? I spent 20+ hours this week manually doing things a computer should handle. It felt absurd. Email isn't broken because we read too much or write too slow. Email is broken because it's a to-do list that makes you do everything manually. And nobody's fixing the actual problem. Working on this. DM me if you think email is secretly just tasks.
Email File Management
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
4.37 billion pieces of mail were undeliverable last year. That’s the part no one talks about. We worry about creative. We argue about channels. We obsess about timing. But most campaigns lose money long before any of that matters. We lose it in the data. I learned this early in my career. I was running an agency, obsessed with creative. I lived and breathed it. I really believed great copy could fix anything. Then I saw a client’s donor file for the first time. > Wrong addresses… > Duplicates… > People who moved years ago… > People who passed away… > Records coded so poorly nothing matched… It didn’t matter how good the letter was. The data broke it before it ever had a chance. That moment changed the course of my career. It’s the reason I eventually got into the lockbox business. Because if the data isn’t right, nothing else works. And here’s the part that still keeps me up: Even with better tools and better hygiene than we had in the 90s, we still wasted more than $1.3 billion on undeliverable mail last year. This isn’t about postage. It’s about trust. It’s about connection. It’s about whether your donor ever even sees what you sent. Good data isn’t back-office work. It’s stewardship. You want higher response rates? Cleaner matchbacks? Better retention? Fix the inputs. Because the best creative in the world can’t overcome a bad address.
-
Most people in marketing think email deliverability is about writing better subject lines. It’s not. When emails stop hitting the inbox, the problem is almost never content... You might need to first check: - Infrastructure / are SPF, DKIM, DMARC aligned & enforced? - Database / are you sending to spam traps or people who stopped engaging years ago? - Sending schedule / did you just blast 50,000 emails after 3 weeks of silence? Looks scammy... - Analytics / do you actually track inbox placement, or just open rates? - Reputation / is someone else on your shared domain hurting your domain health? A properly managed email program can generate ~$38 for every $1 spent. A broken one generates spam complaints. We built this framework after working with 450+ organizations. The pattern is always the same - teams focus on content while the damage comes from the infrastructure, sending schedule, reputation, and domain abuse. If your open rates are dropping, the answer is NOT "write a better email". #EmailDeliverability
-
I don't think you understand. We're living through a time where, with 3-4 hours and $20/month, you can build internal tools that save you thousands. Six months ago, we were burning hours every week trying to manage our email infrastructure across 200+ clients. Our team would manually check which inboxes were disconnected, hunt down domains that weren't assigned to clients, and find infrastructure we were still paying for from churned clients. It was eating up 10-15 hours per week of manual work, and we were constantly missing things that cost us money. - Disconnected inboxes meant campaigns weren't sending. - Unassigned domains meant confused routing. - Clients who churned months ago still had infrastructure running. So I built a dashboard with Lovable that handles all of this automatically. Now it: 1. Flags inboxes with disconnects or disabled warmup so we catch issues before campaigns break 2. Identifies unassigned inboxes which helps with internal routing and prevents confusion 3. Shows us domains canceled at the provider level but still live in Smartlead so we can clean them up 4. Finds active domains in our infrastructure that aren't in Smartlead so we can reupload them properly 5. Surfaces churned clients who still have infrastructure running so we can shut it off and stop bleeding money This thing saves our team 10+ hours every week and probably $2,000+ per month in wasted infrastructure costs. All for the price of a couple Netflix subscriptions. The agencies that survive the next few years are the ones building custom solutions for their specific problems instead of trying to make generic tools work. Stop accepting manual processes that cost you time and money. Build something that solves your exact problem.
-
Most businesses in Kenya are still sending "thank you for your payment" manually on WhatsApp. At midnight. While half asleep. I built a client's entire email system in 45 minutes. Welcome emails. Payment confirmations. Course reminders. Certificate deliveries. All automated. All branded. Here's how. The tool is Resend. It's an email API built for developers and builders. You connect it to your platform, write a template, and trigger emails based on events. Student signs up? Welcome email. Payment confirmed? Receipt. Course completed? Certificate. All automatic. The brain is Supabase Edge Functions. These are small pieces of logic that run when something happens in your database. A new row in the enrollments table triggers the welcome email. A payment status change triggers the confirmation. No manual work. No forgetting. No midnight WhatsApp messages. The design matters. Every email matches the client's brand. Logo. Colors. Professional layout. Not the kind of email that lands in spam looking like a scam from 2012. Here's what most people don't realize. Email is not old technology. It's infrastructure. Social media posts disappear in hours. WhatsApp messages get buried. But an email sits in someone's inbox until they open it. And transactional emails have open rates above 80%. The entire setup took 45 minutes. The client now has a system that handles hundreds of emails without touching her phone once. If you're still manually confirming payments and sending welcome messages one by one, you're not saving money. You're wasting the one thing money can't buy back. — Elvis W.
-
𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐄𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐥 𝐁𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐬 𝐄𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Many managers try to use email as a workflow tool. A problem arises or a decision is required, a mail is sent, people are copied, and the expectation is that action will follow. Many times, it doesn’t. This leads to frustration and the feeling that people don’t care. Over time, the sender gives up (𝘸𝘩𝘺 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘮 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵). 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫’𝐬 𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭. 𝐅𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫’𝐬 𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞, 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲. What they face is : - 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭: What is high priority for the sender may not be high priority for the receiver...and so it gets missed. - 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦: Anything important that requires thought..or emotional energy...is parked for later. But “later” is unstable. Before the receiver returns to it, another wave of emails arrives, with newer urgencies, and the parked mail slips further down. - 𝐌𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐮𝐞𝐬: If clarity is missing, the problem compounds. More emails are exchanged, more people are copied. The same work now sits across multiple inboxes, waiting in multiple queues. With emails flooding inboxes, a strange paradox emerges: the sender believes everyone knows, while the recipient remains unaware, misaligned on urgency, or disconnected from elapsed time - leaving many tasks as orphans. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬: when email is used as a workflow tool, it becomes an unrestricted source of work generation. It assumes the recipient’s attention is infinite and ignores the fact that many others are generating tasks for the same person. Unlimited work is injected into a system with limited attentional capacity. Work-in-process balloons, and everything slows down and some even gets lost...classic high-WIP effects ! Here's what needs to be done : 𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐩 𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐥 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐟𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐨𝐨𝐥. Issues that require understanding and alignment are resolved faster in a 15-minute conversation than through weeks of emails. A conversation explicitly 1) 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 2) 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐠𝐮𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 in real time, and 3) 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞. Elapsed time collapses. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐫 : Every manager should deliberately set aside cadenced time for such conversations, with these slots visible to everyone. This visibility, and the reliance on conversations, prevents WIP from ballooning by filtering in only the right tasks. Conversations are the most effective use of limited attention. That is how work actually moves. Emails can document decisions. They should not be expected to move work between desks. 𝐃𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐫𝐮𝐧 𝐞𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐢𝐧𝐛𝐨𝐱𝐞𝐬...𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬? #Execution #SystemsThinking #Flow
-
FOUNDER: “We rewrote the emails. Rewrote them again. A/B tested 12 variations. Still nothing.” Burned out. Panicked. Sitting across from me, trying to figure out why their outbound system just… stopped working. Here’s what I told them: Your outbound isn’t broken because of copy. It’s broken because no one’s managing the machine. The backend was a disaster. - 6 domains firing cold emails from the same IP. - One inbox hitting 7% bounce rate for weeks - no alerts. - 3 scripts running with no segmentation, one targeting everyone in SaaS with the same 3 lines of copy. - And no one replying to replies, just one poor SDR ghosted by 12 missed meetings. This wasn’t outbound. This was an unmanaged liability. They had a setup - but not a system. And definitely not a scalable one. Here’s the reality most founders don’t see until it’s too late: Setup ≠ Maintenance ≠ Scale → Setup gets you off the ground. → Maintenance keeps you in the air. → Scale needs a pilot, not a passenger. The best systems we’ve built, ones doing 5–10 calls/week with <1% bounce and 5%+ reply rates, follow the same playbook: Dedicated Infra: → New domains. Proper warmup. Deliverability tracking every week. Spam tests, not guesswork. Real-Time List Health: → Validate before sending. Remove soft bounces. Monitor intent signals and engagement decay. Live Reply Handling: → 15-minute response windows. No leads go cold. Inbox managers trained like closers. Performance Loops: → Cold campaigns are living systems. We don’t “test” them—we evolve them. Daily. Segmented Messaging → Not “personalised.” Relevant. Built off live intent signals, not first names and emojis. If no one’s managing deliverability, warmups, list health, and reply handling, you don’t have a system. You have a liability. And sooner or later, the liability gets flagged, filtered, or forgotten.
-
Your email marketing might be broken... and it's not what you think 📧 I was reviewing a very large startup's email strategy recently when something became painfully clear: They were obsessing over subject lines and send times while their entire email foundation was crumbling. Sound familiar? Most businesses treat email marketing like a slot machine - keep pulling the lever and hope for the best. But here's the thing: The SYSTEM matters more than the individual campaigns. Your email performance isn't random. It's the direct result of five critical factors that most marketers completely overlook: 1️⃣ Email architecture - Is your technical foundation solid or full of cracks? 2️⃣ List hygiene - Those "subscribers" from 2018 who never open? They're actively hurting your deliverability. 3️⃣ Acquisition quality - How you BUILD your list matters more than its size. 4️⃣ Journey design - Random blasts ≠ strategic journeys that convert. 5️⃣ Performance tracking - If you can't access your bounce logs and campaign stats, you're flying blind. The real problem? Most businesses jump straight to optimizing content without fixing these foundational issues first. It's like repainting a house with a crumbling foundation. So what's the fix? Start with a complete email system audit. Fix the architecture. Clean your list. Improve acquisition. Map your journeys. And for heaven's sake, get access to your performance data! Only THEN should you worry about that clever subject line. Because the truth is: The best email content in the world won't save a broken email system. Fix the foundation first. Then optimize. Your open rates (and revenue) will thank you.
-
Last week a entrepreneur reached out and said his emails “stopped working.” Open rates dropped. Clicks were down. Messages were landing in Promotions… sometimes Spam. Someone had already told him, “Your strategy might be off.” So he came to me expecting we’d talk messaging. Or subject lines. Or a new angle. We didn’t. Because when performance drops suddenly, I always check trust before tweaking words. His email authentication was the issue. His SPF record was invalid. Not “could be better.” Not “needs optimization.” Broken. Which meant every email he’d sent for months was quietly hurting trust with inbox providers. No copy issue. No content problem. No sudden algorithm shift. Just a technical leak in the foundation. From the sender’s side, nothing looked urgent. Emails were still sending. There was no obvious alarm. From the inbox side, trust was being downgraded a little more with every send. That’s why these problems are so hard to catch. They don’t announce themselves. They show up as performance issues. And people assume the fix is creative. Before rewriting another email, or testing another subject line, it’s worth asking: What if the thing you keep rewriting… isn’t the problem at all? Some problems don’t need better ideas. They need the foundation checked.
-
"Stop using 2010 marketing tactics in 2025." – Gary Vee Most brands didn’t get the memo. Especially when it comes to email. We just audited a DTC brand doing $5M+ a year. Looked solid from the outside. But under the hood? Bleeding $$ daily. Here’s what we uncovered: • 6,090 cart abandonment emails skipped in 30 days Not delivered. Not delayed. Blocked. One line of flawed logic did it. • Browse abandonment CTR was 1.9% On high-intent traffic. That should be like 8–10%, minimum. It’s not their offer. It’s the setup. • Win-back flow with 0.2% clicks. No suppression strategy. Just dead weight dragging down deliverability. • Flows triggering 1x per lifetime So if I abandon 5 carts over six months, I only get emailed once? • Over 37,000 “ghost” profiles still being emailed. They haven’t clicked or opened in 90 days. Why are they still getting anything? This isn’t poor strategy. This is negligence disguised as email marketing. And it’s costing you more than you think. These aren’t just broken flows. They’re black holes in your retention engine. And most brands (like this one) are leaking tens of thousands in revenue each day because of it. Not because the copy sucks. Not because the design is basic. Not because the segment’s wrong. But because your automations are too dumb to keep up. Here’s the fix: • Rebuild flows to reflect actual buyer behavior • Allow re-entry into high-intent flows • Suppress dead weight fast • Create bridge flows for the grey zone • Stop messaging people who’ve ghosted you for 3+ months If you're still running flows built in 2018? You're not sending email. You're setting money on fire in slow motion.