Message391259
When I looked at the table yesterday (after several years), I was initially confused at the 'reversed' order (before I checked the text above). Besides precedence usually (nearly always) being listed high to low*, the chapter itself is highest to lowest, so the table is reversed from the chapter order.
* I checked K&R C and several sites and images and all I saw had highest at the top (highest). This include other Python charts.
The table has been this way since at least 1.4
https://docs.python.org/release/1.4/ref/ref5.html#HDR18
Guido, how would you feel about reversing it to follow what seems to be the de facto standard?
The header 'Operator' could be changed to 'Operator (lowest first)' but I would prefer to make that 'Operator (highest first)'. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2021-04-16 21:11:55 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, gvanrossum, steven.daprano, docs@python, zach.ware, aidan.feldman |
| 2021-04-16 21:11:55 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1618607515.83.0.437211522795.issue43837@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-04-16 21:11:55 | terry.reedy | link | issue43837 messages |
| 2021-04-16 21:11:55 | terry.reedy | create | |
|